Inventiv.org
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • USPTO Pro Bono Program
    • Patent Guide
    • Press Release
  • Patent FAQs
    • IP Basics
    • Patent Basics
      • Patent Basics
      • Set up an Account with the USPTO
      • Need for a Patent Attorney or Agent
    • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Builder
      • After you submit a PPA
    • Utility Patent Application
      • Utility Patent Application
      • File a Utility Patent Application
      • What Happens After Filing Utility Application?
    • Respond to Office Actions
    • Patent Issurance
  • ProvisionalBuilder
  • Login
  • Contact
  • Blogs
Inventiv.org
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • USPTO Pro Bono Program
    • Patent Guide
    • Press Release
  • Patent FAQs
    • IP Basics
    • Patent Basics
      • Patent Basics
      • Set up an Account with the USPTO
      • Need for a Patent Attorney or Agent
    • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Builder
      • After you submit a PPA
    • Utility Patent Application
      • Utility Patent Application
      • File a Utility Patent Application
      • What Happens After Filing Utility Application?
    • Respond to Office Actions
    • Patent Issurance
  • ProvisionalBuilder
  • Login
  • Contact
  • Blogs

OPTIMIZING MEDIA EXPERIENCE IN CONFERENCING WITH DIVERSE PARTICIPANTS

Inventiv.org
July 21, 2025
Software

Invented by Chandok; Gurtej Singh G., Garrido; Christopher M., Lu; Chieh, Pollack; Daniel B., Santhanam; Karthick, Biderman; David L., Qui; Jinbo, Zhang; Dazhong, Hinojosa; Jose A. Lozano, Kobzar; Igor

Have you ever tried to join a video call from a phone, only to find that the quality drops for everyone? Or maybe you’ve been on a call where someone joins from a different device, and suddenly things get choppy or grainy. The patent application we’re exploring today tackles this very problem. Let’s break down how it works, why it matters, and what makes it special.

Background and Market Context

Today, millions of people use video calling every day. Whether for meetings, classes, or catching up with friends, video conferencing is everywhere. Apps like Zoom, FaceTime, Teams, and WebEx have changed how we work and connect. But with all the different devices out there—laptops, tablets, phones, smart displays—everyone’s setup is a little different.

Each device has different strengths. Some have strong cameras, others have fast chips, and some are built mainly for calling, not video. Plus, each device may use a different “codec”—a tool that squashes video and audio into a form that can be sent over the internet, then stretches it back out for viewing. Some codecs are new and give crisp, clear video. Others are older but work on more devices.

Here’s the big challenge: when you want everyone on a call, the app usually has to pick a codec that every device supports. That often means using an older, lower-quality codec. If someone on a slow connection or old phone joins, everyone might have to use lower quality, so the new person can see and hear the call. That’s not fair for people with good equipment and fast networks.

Some apps try to fix this by using special servers that “translate” video between codecs. But if the video is encrypted—scrambled for privacy—the server can’t open it up to change it. That means everyone still has to use the same codec, or some people can’t join at all.

This is where the patent application steps in. The idea is to let each person on a call use the best codec they can, while also making sure everyone can still join—even if that means some people get a different stream. This way, the call can be high quality for most people, but still open to everyone, no matter what device they’re on.

Scientific Rationale and Prior Art

Let’s talk about the science and what’s been tried before. Video and audio codecs are like translators for your camera and microphone. They take raw video, make it smaller for sending over the internet, and then open it up on the other side. Each codec has its own way of squashing and stretching the video. Some are better at keeping things sharp. Others work on more devices, but don’t look or sound as good.

For years, video calling apps faced a tough choice: should they pick the best quality codec, which only some devices support, or the most common one, which is lower quality but works for everyone? Most apps picked the common codec. That meant everyone could join, but the video might look fuzzy.

Some newer systems tried to fix this by using servers that could “transcode”—change the codec of a video in the middle, so each device gets the version it can handle. This works if the server can see the video, but if calls are end-to-end encrypted (for privacy), the server can’t open the video to change it. That means transcoding is out, and everyone has to use the lowest common codec again.

People have also tried splitting calls into separate groups—one group on a high-quality codec, another on lower-quality. But this makes things confusing and hard to manage. If someone’s network slows down, everyone’s quality might drop, even if most people could handle better video. There wasn’t a good way to let each device use the best codec it could, while still keeping the call open to everyone, and especially while keeping everything encrypted and private.

This patent application builds on all of this. It introduces a smart way for each device to share what codecs it supports, pick the best one for each connection, and create new streams on demand if someone with different needs joins. It also keeps things private, since the server never has to open up the video to change it.

Invention Description and Key Innovations

Here’s where things get exciting. The invention describes a method that lets every device on a video call use the best codec it can, but also makes sure anyone can join—even if that means creating a new stream just for them. Here’s how it works, step by step:

When a video call starts, each device tells the server what codecs it can use. The server shares this info with all the devices. When one person wants to send video to another, they pick the best codec they both support. If a third person wants to join, and they can’t handle the codec the first two are using, the first person can create a new stream just for them, using a codec that everyone supports.

This means that:

– People with newer devices and good connections get the best quality.
– If someone with an older device joins, they still get to join. They might get a lower-quality stream, but they’re not left out.
– The server never has to open or change the video, so everything can stay private and encrypted.

The invention also lets devices switch codecs on the fly. If someone’s connection slows down, or their device gets too hot, they can switch from a high-quality codec to the common one. The server helps everyone keep track of what streams are available, and who should get which one. Sometimes, the switch happens automatically by “tagging” the new stream with the old stream’s name, so the server knows to send it to the right person. Other times, the device tells the server to make the switch, and the person on the other end subscribes to the new stream.

Another smart feature is “on-demand” stream creation. The device doesn’t have to create every possible stream all the time. It only creates a new stream when someone actually needs it. This saves battery, processing power, and network bandwidth.

The system is also flexible. It works whether people are using the same app (like FaceTime on iPhones) or different ones (like someone on Android joining a FaceTime call through a web browser). It keeps everyone connected, no matter what device or app they use.

Finally, the invention recognizes that conditions change. If someone’s device gets too hot, or their connection drops, the system can quickly fall back to the common codec. When things get better, it can switch back to high quality. This can happen without anyone noticing, and without dropping anyone from the call.

To sum it up, the key innovations here are:

– Letting each device use the best codec it can, while still keeping the call open to everyone.
– Creating new streams only when needed, to save resources.
– Allowing fast, smooth switching between codecs if conditions change.
– Keeping everything encrypted and private, with no need for servers to “translate” the video.
– Working across all kinds of devices and apps.

Conclusion

This patent application offers a smarter way to handle video calls in the real world. It recognizes that everyone has different devices, networks, and needs. By letting each device use the best codec it can, and creating new streams only when needed, it makes video calls clearer, smoother, and more inclusive. It also keeps things private and secure, which matters more than ever.

For anyone building a video calling app, or just curious about how these calls work behind the scenes, this invention points the way to better, fairer, and more flexible video conferencing. It’s a big step toward making sure everyone can join the call, without dragging down the quality for those who can handle more. And that’s something we can all appreciate the next time we’re on a video call—no matter what device we’re using.

Click here https://ppubs.uspto.gov/pubwebapp/ and search 20250220139.

Tags: Amazon Patent Review
Previous Story
MANAGEMENT OF OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE USING READ-ONLY MULTI-ATTACH BLOCK VOLUMES
Next Story
SELECTIVE ACTIVATION DURING COHERENCE-BASED EYE TRACKING

Related Articles

PHOTONIC INTEGRATED CIRCUITS WITH SUBSTRATE NOISE COUPLING MITIGATION

Invented by Wang; Zhechao, Vazimali; Milad Gholipour, Liu; Qing Photonic...

RESAMPLER FOR ELECTRONIC DISPLAY HAVING MULTIPLE PIXEL LAYOUTS

Invented by Boo; Hyun H., Miscuglio; Mario, Hu; Jenny, Guan;...

Menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • USPTO Pro Bono Program
    • Patent Guide
    • Press Release
  • Patent FAQs
    • IP Basics
    • Patent Basics
      • Patent Basics
      • Set up an Account with the USPTO
      • Need for a Patent Attorney or Agent
    • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Builder
      • After you submit a PPA
    • Utility Patent Application
      • Utility Patent Application
      • File a Utility Patent Application
      • What Happens After Filing Utility Application?
    • Respond to Office Actions
    • Patent Issurance
  • ProvisionalBuilder
  • Login
  • Contact
  • Blogs

Disclaimer Communications between you and Inventiv Foundation are protected by our Privacy Policy but not by the attorney-client privilege or as work product. Inventiv Foundation, Inc. can connect you to independent attorneys and self-help services at your specific direction. We are not a law firm or a substitute for an attorney or law firm. We cannot provide any kind of advice, explanation, opinion, or recommendation about possible legal rights, remedies, defenses, options, selection of forms or strategies. Your access to the website is subject to our Terms of Use.

Tags

Alphabet Amazon Facebook/Meta Microsoft Patent Review Samsung
  • Home
  • About
  • Inventiv’s Daily
  • Inventiv Cloud
  • Blogs
  • Contact
Inventiv.org
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • USPTO Pro Bono Program
    • Patent Guide
    • Press Release
  • Patent FAQs
    • IP Basics
    • Patent Basics
      • Patent Basics
      • Set up an Account with the USPTO
      • Need for a Patent Attorney or Agent
    • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Builder
      • After you submit a PPA
    • Utility Patent Application
      • Utility Patent Application
      • File a Utility Patent Application
      • What Happens After Filing Utility Application?
    • Respond to Office Actions
    • Patent Issurance
  • ProvisionalBuilder
  • Login
  • Contact
  • Blogs
Inventiv.org
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
    • USPTO Pro Bono Program
    • Patent Guide
    • Press Release
  • Patent FAQs
    • IP Basics
    • Patent Basics
      • Patent Basics
      • Set up an Account with the USPTO
      • Need for a Patent Attorney or Agent
    • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Patent Application
      • Provisional Builder
      • After you submit a PPA
    • Utility Patent Application
      • Utility Patent Application
      • File a Utility Patent Application
      • What Happens After Filing Utility Application?
    • Respond to Office Actions
    • Patent Issurance
  • ProvisionalBuilder
  • Login
  • Contact
  • Blogs